Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 14.
Published in final edited form as: Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2013 Apr 10;20(5):408–416. doi: 10.3109/09687637.2013.783792

Table II.

Linear regression model: factors associated with endorsement of buprenorphine and CBT treatment (n = 571).

Standardized Parameter Estimate (95% CI)
Buprenorphine CBT
Demographics
Age (years) 0.06 (0.00, 0.01) 0.09 (0.01, 0.02)*
Race/ethnicity
    White (reference)
    African–American –0.06 (–0.29, 0.02) –0.09 (–0.51, –0.05)*
    Native-American 0.03 (–0.18, 0.49) 0.02 (–0.35, 0.63)
    Latino –0.01 (–0.29, 0.20) –0.03 (–0.50, 0.18)
    Asian/P. Islander –0.04 (–0.50, 0.14) 0.01 (–0.40, 0.52)
Gender (ref: female) 0.06 (0, 0.23) 0.06 (–0.02, 0.31)
Provider type
    Medical staff (ref.)a
    Social workers –0.15 (–0.42, 0.12)*** 0.10 (0.06, 0.48)*
    Psychologists –0.10 (–0.34, –0.02)* 0.01 (–0.19, 0.25)
    Counsellors –0.15 (–0.45, –0.13)*** 0.01 (–0.19, 0.27)
Research involved 0.09 (0.02, 0.34)* 0.09 (0.03, 0.48)*
Training needs
    Patient rapport 0.11 (0.02, 0.14)** –0.20 (–0.30, –0.12)***
    Patient management –0.02 (–0.07, 0.04) 0.09 (.002, 0.17)*
    Patient needs –0.02 (–0.07, 0.05) 0.14 (0.06, 0.24)**
Attitudes
    EBP 0.18 (0.06, 0.14)*** 0.13 (0.05, 0.16)***
Knowledge 0.07 (0, 0.05) 0.03 (–0.02, 0.05)
Agency
    Tech. capacity –0.02 (–0.04, 0.02) 0.02 (–0.03, 0.06)
    Support growth –0.04 (–0.04, 0.01) –0.01 (–0.04, 0.03)

Notes:

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p < 0.001.

a

Medical staff is the reference group, and other groups are significantly lower in their endorsement as represented by the negative slope coefficient (counsellors having the lowest endorsement of all groups when compared with medical providers).