Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 26;26(2):618–627. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu227

Table 4.

Performance scores across delays and lists at 2 years of age

Group/case 10s 30s 60s 120s LL3 LL5 LL10 Average
N
 N-1a 92 98 98 91 97 91 83 93
 N-2a 95 93 94 91 79 79 63 85
 N-3a 100 95 94 93 97 98 67 92
 N-4a 94 95 97 92 94 84 86 92
 N-5 90 88 91 92 93 85 79 88
 N-6 88 90 90 89 89 76 67 84
 M 93 93 94 91 92 86 74 89
IC
 Neo-IC-1a 94 95 95 95 99 91 88 94
 Neo-IC-2a 95 95 93 95 95 91 81 92
 Neo-IC-3a 83 86 86 79 84 77 56 79
 Neo-IC-4a 88 87 89 84 83 79 67 82
 M 90 91 91 88 90 85 73 87
ICO
 Neo-ICO-1 91 88 76 88 77 68 65 79
 Neo-ICO-2 82 85 81 75 70 65 58 74
 Neo-ICO-3 84 84 83 83 71 64 87 79
 Neo-ICO-4 93 83 88 82 80 79 79 84
 M 88 85 82 82 75 69 65 79
O
 Neo-O-1 88 95 93 89 92 73 67 85
 Neo-O-2 90 88 83 81 76 57 59 76
 Neo-O-3 84 83 80 85 75 69 52 75
  M 87 89 85 85 81 66 59 79

Note: Scores are percent correct choices over 100 trials at each delay and over 150 trials at each list of the DNMS performance test. Percentage correct represents the average score across the 4 delays and 3 lists. M, mean; numbers in italics represent mean values for each group.

aAnimals that were already reported in Málková et al. (2000). Note that Case O-4 was not tested at 2 years of age.