Table 3.
Hypothesis | Prediction | Observation | Conclusion | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trade-off between lifespan and reproduction. | Traits peak in different regions of nutrient landscape. | Females—prediction met. Males—prediction met in non-supplemented males but not in supplemented males. |
Sex-specific trade-off, pronounced in females, weak in males. | |
Accumulation of oxidative damage causes aging. | Damage highest in short lived animals. | Generally, high damage, long lifespan. | Oxidative damage to proteins does not appear to mediate variation in lifespan within each sex, following dietary manipulation. | |
Antioxidant supplementation improves lifespan. | No effect of antioxidants on survival. | |||
Reproductive effort elevates oxidative stress. | High reproductive effort reduces antioxidant defences. | Mixed support: results depend on sex and supplementation status. | Association between oxidative damage and reproductive effort varies enormously across the sexes. | |
High reproductive effort increases oxidative damage. | ||||
Antioxidant supplementation improves reproductive effort. | Weak positive effect but not significant. |