Table 2. Adjusting p-values with Finner post hoc procedure.
| Finner score for SVM-RFE as winner |
Finner score for FSMKL as winner |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technique | p-value | adjusted p-value | Finner score | p-value | adjusted p-value | Finner score |
| SVM-RFE* | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| FSMKL* | 0.681 | 0.681 | 0.05 | – | – | – |
| GA-SVM* | 0.100 | 0.116 | 0.043 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.050 |
| ncMCE_corr-SVM | 3.00 × 10−3 | 4.20 × 10−3 | 0.035 | 0.029 | 0.035 | 0.041 |
| NB | 2.60 × 10−4 | 6.08 × 10−4 | 0.028 | 5.41 × 10−5 | 1.08 × 10−4 | 0.033 |
| SVM | 2.60 × 10−4 | 6.08 × 10−4 | 0.021 | 5.41 × 10−5 | 1.08 × 10−4 | 0.025 |
| PSO-SVM* | 5.01 × 10−6 | 1.75 × 10−5 | 0.014 | 1.14 × 10−6 | 3.43 × 10−6 | 0.016 |
| MKL* | 5.14 × 10−7 | 3.60 × 10−6 | 0.0073 | 2.27 × 10−8 | 1.36 × 10−7 | 0.085 |
*In this table we present the p-value, adjusted p-value and the final value achieved with Finner procedure for the techniques evaluated in this study according with the winner model. Feature Selection approach.