Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 14;10(1):e0004376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004376

Table 1. Summary of hierarchical AMOVA for different geographical groupings and genetic clustering.

Grouping Source of variation df Sum of squares Estimated variation (%) Statistic p-value
Geographic locations By areas1 Between areas 4 93.9 17% PHIPT = 0.17 0.0001
Within areas 123 525.9 83%
By villages2 Between areas 4 136.8 22% PHIRT = 0.22 0.0002
Between villages within areas 7 43.6 4% PHIPR = 0.06 0.0036
Within villages 116 482.3 73% PHIPT = 0.27 0.0001
Genetic clusters3 K = 2 Between clusters 1 73 37% PHIPT = 0.37 0.0001
Within clusters 87 355.3 63%
K = 3* Between clusters 1 53.3 26% PHIPT = 0.26 0.0001
Within clusters 79 338.7 74%
K = 7 Between clusters 6 224.9 59% PHIPT = 0.59 0.0001
Within clusters 80 167.2 41%

At 2-level hierarchical AMOVA: PHIPT = estimate of the proportion of the parasites’ genetic variance between areas/clusters relative to the total variance. At 3-level hierarchical AMOVA: PHIRT, PHIPR and PHIPT = proportion of variance between the areas, between villages and within villages, respectively.

1Number of isolates: A1 (n = 60), A2 (n = 16), A3 (n = 10), A4 (n = 38), A5 (n = 4)

2Number of isolates: A1 (MN = 20, FM = 7, SR = 20, LP = 7, SP = 6), A2 (VS = 4, others A2 = 12), A3 (VA = 7, others A3 = 3), A4 (SC = 36, VBP = 2), A5 = 4.

3Genetic clustering assignment performed using STRUCTURE. Parasites classified as admixed were not considered for AMOVA. When K = 2 the clusters contained: 71 and 18 isolates; when K = 3: 58 and 23 isolates; and when K = 7: 23, 18, 15, 11, 10, 7 and 3 isolates.

* For K = 3, only two clusters were considered since no isolate was assigned as full member of the third cluster.