Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 6;4(1):E1–E16. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393079

Table 1. Characteristics of the randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis.

Study (reference) Country n Lesion size, mm Intervention Control R0 A, % R0 B, % P value
Stomach (ESD)
Sumiyama et al. (2014) 17 Japan 100 18.29 Mesna NS 100 98.8 NS
Kim et al. (2013) 18 South Korea  63 13.84 SH NS 90.9* 61.1* 0.004
Stomach (EMR)
Yamamoto et al. (2008) 22 Japan 140 5 – 20 SH NS 92.8 94.3 0.745
Stomach and colon (EMR)
Varadarajulu et al. (2006) 24 USA  60 22.5 D50 NS 96.3 80.0 0.09
Lee et al. (2006) 25 South Korea  72 17.98 Fibrinogen NS 86.1 80.6 0.53
Colorectal (EMR)
Kishihara et al. (2012) 21 Japan  94 SH NS 97.8 93.8 0.06
Yoshida et al. (2012) 20 Japan 189 8.54 SH NS 79.5 65.6 0.03
Fasoulas et al. (2012) 26 Greece  49 46 HES NS 96.0 95.8 0.94
Moss et al. (2010) 27 Australia  80 37.5 SG NS 90.0 90.0 1.0
Katsinelos et al. (2008) 23 Greece  92 23 D50 NS 93.3 87.2 0.13
Hurlstone et al. (2008) 19 UK 163 19.1 D50 SH 72.0 69.1 > 0.01

R0 A, complete resection rate in active group; R0 B, complete resection rate in control group; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; SH, sodium hyaluronate; NS, normal saline; D50, 50 % dextrose; SG, succinylated gelatin.

*

These proportions refer to clinical usefulness rate (complete resection within one additional submucosal injection).