Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Chemistry. 2015 Oct 29;21(50):18364–18374. doi: 10.1002/chem.201502762

Table 4.

Comparison of two-photon absorption calculations using PBE0 and CAM-B3LYP functionals.

PBE0 CAM-B3LYP

Mol. λex
[nm]
2PA
strength
103 [a.u.]
2PA cross
section
103 [GM]
λex
[nm]
2PA
strength
103 [a.u.]
2PA
cross
section
103
[GM]
6a 469 0.427 0.002 392 0.222 0.002
415 230.0 1.492 336 166.0 1.650
398 0.016 0 315 0.007 0
359 4.482 0.039 315 4.340 0.049
323 0.592 0.006 314 0.011 0
7 373 0.040 0 338 0.023 0
327 0.005 0 283 0.191 0.003
322 31.10 0.338 281 39.70 0.561
316 0.942 0.011 273 9.570 0.144
309 41.26 0.482 270 3.560 0.054
8 400 0.060 0 358 0.037 0
347 0.010 0 296 92.00 1.180
339 126.6 1.235 293 0.004 0
317 0.042 0 276 4.990 0.073
316 9.611 0.108 275 0.039 0.001
9 393 0.060 0 353 0.042 0
338 0.009 0 291 78.40 1.030
325 100.0 0.998 289 0.004 0
321 0.062 0.001 274 6.180 0.092
318 25.88 0.285 273 0.052 0.001
10 385 0.039 0 346 0.032 0
384 0.042 0 289 2.190 0.029
381 0.050 0 289 0.347 0.005
335 0.006 0 288 0.020 0
323 62.00 0.665 284 62.60 0.867
15 469 0 0 404 0 0
405 273.1 1.861 333 232.0 2.330
349 0 0 316 0.077 0.001
324 0.547 0.006 315 5.190 0.058
324 0.134 0.001 287 0.002 0