Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 14;11(1):e0147040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147040

Table 8. Summary of the bivariate Bayesian correlations of all variables.

male female 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(1) Gender N = 29 N = 36
NASE ASE
(2) Employment group N = 49 N = 17 -b 1
M SD
(3) Tenure 4.76 6.52 .07 -.25 1
[-.22;.35] [-.49;25]
(4) GSE 2.22 0.58 -.20 .28 -.06 1
[-.42;.05] [.01;.52] [-.31;.20]
(5) OSE 2.32 0.67 -.29 .24 .01 .83 1
[-.51;.05] [.01;.47] [-.24;27] [.73;.89]
(6) LS 2.65 1.07 -.09 .07 .17 .44 .45 1
[-.35;.14] [-.17;.32] [-.10;.42] [.22;.62] [.24;.64]
(7) JSa 0.00 0.88 .02 .00 .10 .30 .38 .65 1
[-.23;.26] [-.25;.24] [-.17;.36] [.06;.52] [.16;.58] [.49;.78]
(8) improvement 3.41 1.35 -.09 .08 .01 .33 .32 .38 .61 1
[-.34;.16] [-.17;.32] [-.26;27] [.09;.54] [.10;.53] [.16;.58] [.44;.76]
(9) job importance 4.11 1.23 -.17 .18 -.01 .41 .42 .35 .23 .34 1
[-.41;.08] [-.06;43] [-.28;26] [.18;.61] [.20;.62] [.12;.55] [-.02;.45] [.09;.56]
(10) strengths 3.39 1.40 -.13 .16 .09 .45 .48 .62 .81 .60 .29 1
[-.37;.11] [-.08;.39] [-.17;.35] [.24;64] [.27;.66] [.45;.76] [.72;.90] [.42;.75] [.05;.51]

Note. 95% high-density intervals are displayed in brackets; NASE = non-autism-specific employment; ASE = autism-specific employment; GSE = general self-efficacy, OSE = occupational self-efficacy, LS = life satisfaction, JS = job satisfaction, improvement = control item regarding quality of life improvement durinc current employment, job importance = control item regarding the importance of a job for the quality of life, strengths = control item regarding the use of strengths in current employment,

a = standardized z-score,

b = left out of data-analysis due to one employment group being an all-male-group.