Table 4.
Comparison of the genotype and allele distribution of EGFR rs6965469 and rs763317 in two groups
| Groups | rs6965469 | ||||
|
| |||||
| CC | CT | TT | C | T | |
|
| |||||
| Case (n, %) | 24 (48.0) | 15 (30.0) | 11 (22.0) | 63 (63.0) | 37 (37.0) |
| Control (n, %) | 34 (65.4) | 16 (30.8) | 2 (3.8) | 84 (80.8) | 20 (19.2) |
| OR (95% CI) | Reference | 1.33 (0.55-3.19) | 7.79 (1.58-38.4) | Reference | 2.47 (1.31-4.65) |
| ORa (95% CI) | Reference | 1.10 (0.44-2.78) | 6.92 (1.33-36.00) | Reference | 2.51 (0.96-6.58) |
|
| |||||
| Groups | rs763317 | ||||
|
| |||||
| GG | GA | AA | G | A | |
|
| |||||
| Case (n, %) | 19 (38.0) | 22 (44.0) | 9 (18.0) | 60 (60.0) | 40 (40.0) |
| Control (n, %) | 32 (61.5) | 18 (34.6) | 2 (3.9) | 82 (78.8) | 22 (21.2) |
| OR (95% CI) | Reference | 2.06 (0.89-4.78) | 7.58 (1.48-38.8) | Reference | 2.49 (1.34-4.61) |
| ORa (95% CI) | Reference | 2.08 (0.85-5.11) | 7.20 (1.33-39.07) | Reference | 2.61 (1.04-6.59) |
a
means the results were adjusted by sex, age, drinking and smoking status.