Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 7;72:211–218. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1972-2

Table 3.

Association between individual antidepressant drug classes and incident myocardial infarction

Use of SSRIs Use of TCAs
Percentagea Events OR (95 % CI) Percentagea Events OR (95 % CI)
Analysis 1Ab
Nonuse 92.2 595 1 (reference) 90.6 587 1 (reference)
Current use 1.8 7 0.70 (0.42–1.17) 1.6 9 0.84 (0.53–1.33)
Past use 6.0 48 1.33 (0.97–1.83) 7.8 54 1.05 (0.79–1.41)
Analysis 1Bc
Nonuse 92.4 681 1 (reference) 90.7 672 1 (reference)
Current use 1.8 8 0.65 (0.41–1.02) 1.6 10 0.80 (0.52–1.24)
Past use 5.8 55 1.42 (1.06–1.90) 7.7 62 1.04 (0.79–1.38)
Analysis 2d
Past use 5.8 50 1 (reference) 7.7 54 1 (reference)
Current use 1.8 7 0.58 (0.23–1.49) 1.6 10 0.60 (0.26–1.41)

Matched on age and sex and adjusted for: history of deep venous thrombosis, history of heart failure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, maximum level of education, total cholesterol, smoking, blood-pressure-lowering agents, antithrombotic agents, antipsychotic agents, anxiolytics, hypnotics, depression and anxiety, and current use of the other antidepressant drug classes (including other antidepressants)

Abbreviations: 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, OR odds ratio, SSRIs selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, TCAs tricyclic antidepressants

aAs we studied the associations with time-varying exposure analysis, controls contributed more than once in the computation of the odds ratios before they were censored of became a case. For this reason, exposure is reported as a percentage

bAnalyses with never use of antidepressants as reference, using unimputed data

cAnalyses with never use of antidepressants as reference, using imputed data

dAnalyses with past use of antidepressants as reference, using imputed data. For the analysis on SSRIs, 1 case currently using had no matched controls and 5 cases who were past user had no matched controls. For the analysis on TCAs, 8 past users could not be matched. These were therefore not included in the analyses