Table 1.
Summary of sexual isolation indices from field cage tests carried out for the Anastrepha fraterculus complex.
| Reference | Population – mating combination | Morphotypes combination | ISI | Isolation level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petit-Marty et al. 2004 | Tucumán (Arg) – Entre Ríos (Arg) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | –0.01 ± 0.17 | Random mating |
| Tucumán (Arg) – Misiones (Arg) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | –0.03 ± 0.05 | Random mating | |
| Jujuy (Arg) – Tucumán (Arg) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | – 0.01 ± 0.05 | Random mating | |
| Jujuy (Arg) – Entre Ríos (Arg) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | – 0.04 ± 0.17 | Random mating | |
| Jujuy (Arg) – Misiones (Arg) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | –0.09 ± 0.09 | Random mating | |
| Misiones (Arg) – Entre Ríos (Arg) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | –0.09 ± 0.13 | Random mating | |
| Vera et al. 2006 | La Molina (Peru) – Entre Ríos (Arg) | Peruvian – Brazilian-1 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | High |
| Tucumán (Arg) – Piura + La Molina (Peru) | Brazilian-1 – Peruvian | 0.83 ± 0.06 | High | |
| Tucumán (Arg) – La Molina (Peru) | Brazilian-1 – Peruvian | 0.82 ± 0.03 | High | |
| La Molina (Peru) – Ibague (Col) | Peruvian – Andean | 0.78 ± 0.02 | High | |
| La Molina (Peru) – Piracicaba (Br) | Peruvian – Brazilian-1 | 0.55 ± 0.06 | Moderate | |
| Tucumán (Arg) – Piracicaba (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.43 ± 0.08 | Moderate | |
| Tucumán (Arg) – Entre Ríos (Arg) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.12 ± 0.10 | Random mating | |
| La Molina (Peru) – Piura + La Molina (Peru) | Peruvian – Peruvian | 0.10 ± 0.12 | Random mating | |
| Cáceres et al. 2009 | Tucumán (Arg) – La Molina (Peru) | Brazilian-1 – Peruvian | 0.77 ± 0.05 | High |
| Tucumán (Arg) – La Molina (Peru)Unisex Arg | Brazilian-1 – Peruvian | 0.73 ± 0.05 | High | |
| Tucumán (Arg) – La Molina (Peru)Unisex Peru | Brazilian-1 – Peruvian | 0.86 ± 0.04 | High | |
| Hybrid ArgPeru – ArgUnisexArg | Hybrid Brazilian-1 /Peruvian – Brazilian-1 | 0.30 ± 0.12 | Moderate | |
| Hybrid PeruArg – ArgUnisexArg | Hybrid Peruvian /Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.15 ± 0.11 | Random mating | |
| Hybrid ArgPeru – PeruUnisexPeru | Hybrid Brazilian-1 /Peruvian – Peruvian | 0.10 ± 0.10 | Random mating | |
| Hybrid PeruArg – PeruUnisexPeru | Hybrid Peruvian /Brazilian-1 – Peruvian | 0.13 ± 0.09 | Random mating | |
| Rull et al. 2012 | Tucumán (Arg) – Vacaria (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.12 ± 0.06 | Random mating |
| Tucumán (Arg) – Pelotas (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.14 ± 0.09 | Random mating | |
| Pelotas (Br) – Vacaria (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.14 ± 0.08 | Random mating | |
| Dias 2012 | Pelotas (Br) – Bento Gonçalves (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0. 14 ± 0.07 | Random mating |
| São Joaquim (Br) – Vacaria (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | Random mating | |
| São Joaquim (Br) – Bento Gonçalves (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.14 ± 0.07 | Random mating | |
| Bento Gonçalves (Br) – Vacaria (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.03 ± 0.05 | Random mating | |
| Piracicaba (Br) – São Joaquim (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.55 ± 0.09 | Moderate | |
| Piracicaba (Br) – Bento Gonçalves (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | Moderate | |
| Piracicaba (Br) – Vacaria (Br) | Brazilian-1 – Brazilian-1 | 0.53 ± 0.10 | Moderate | |
| Rull et al. 2013 | Xalapa (Mex) – Tucumán (Arg) | Mexican – Brazilian-1 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | High |
| Xalapa (Mex) – Vacaria + Pelotas (Br) | Mexican – Brazilian-1 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | High | |
| Xalapa (Mex) – La Molina (Peru) | Mexican – Peruvian | 0.74 ± 0.03 | High | |
| Devescovi et al. 2014* | Tucumán (Arg) – Ibague (Col) | Brazilian-1 – Andean | 1 | High |
| Xalapa (Mex) – Ibague (Col) | Mexican – Andean | 0.94 | High | |
| La Molina (Peru) – Ibague (Col) | Peruvian – Andean | 0.65 | Moderate-High |
*
ISI values were estimated from Table 1.