Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 3;32(3):115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.krcp.2013.07.002

Table 1.

Reasons for renal biopsy in type 2 diabetic patients,

Reason for renal biopsy Group I (n=10) Group II (n=11) Group III (n=54) P
Nephrotic range proteinuria with atypical course (n=33) 5 (15.2) 8 (24.2) 20 (60.6) 0.003
Proteinuria without diabetic retinopathy (n=15) 2 (13.3) 1 (6.7) 12 (80.0) 0.001
Unexplained decline of renal function (n=15) 1 (6.7) 1 (6.7) 13 (86.7) <0.001
Unexplained hematuria (n=10) 1 (10.0) 1 (10.0) 8 (80.0) 0.007
Proteinuria with short duration of diabetes (n=2) 1 (50.0) 0 (0) 1 (50.0) NS

Data are presented as n (%).

DN, diabetic nephropathy; NN, nondiabetic nephropathy; NS, nonsignificant value.

Differences in prevalence among the three groups were analyzed separately with nonparametric tests according to reason for biopsy.

Group I: DN, Group II: DN+NN, Group III: NN.

P=0.514 by Fisher′s exact test.