Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 15;16:22. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2051-5

Table 4.

Best objective tumor response (investigator assessment) in Study 1199 by primary KIT mutational status, and in the overall ITT population of Study 1036

Response parameter Study 1199 1036 ITT (N = 1124)
Exon 9 (n = 42) Exon 11 (n = 143)
Best confirmed tumor response,a n (%)
 CR 2 (5) 0 10 (1)
 PR 6 (14) 9 (6) 78 (7)
 Stable disease 29 (69) 86 (60) 639 (57)
 PD 4 (10) 31 (22) 237 (21)
 Not evaluable 0 1 (1) 2 (<1)
 Missing 1 (2) 16 (11) 158 (14)
Confirmed objective responses,b n (%) 8 (19) 9 (6) 88 (8)
 95 % exact CI, % 9−34 3−12 6−10
Difference in ORR: exon 9 vs. exon 11, % 13 NA
 95 % CI <1−25 NA
P-value (two-sided Pearson χ2) 0.012 NA

CI confidence interval, CR complete response, ITT intent-to-treat, NA not applicable, PD progressive disease, PR partial response

aTumor assessment data obtained ≤28 days after last dose of study drug

bCR  + PR