Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;36(10):3793–3804. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22878

Table 2.

Results of the general linear model [Eq. (1)] analysis for processing speed and working memory

Processing speed Working memory
β R WMGM (P‐value) 219.05 ± 81.80 (0.01) 10.99 ± 25.91 (0.67)
β FA (P‐value) 0.03 ± 0.01 (0.004) 0.005 ± 0.004 (0.14)
dx (P‐value) 79.11 ± 67.68 (0.25) 76.68 ± 69.53 (0.27)
βR WMGM x d x (P‐value) −81.24 ± 107.07 (0.45) 32.35 ± 33.80 (0.34)
β FA x d x (P‐value) −0.02 ± 0.02 (0.24) −0.004 ± 0.005 (0.46)
r 2 38% 14%
F 5,102 (P‐value) 13.13 (P = 10−9) 4.43 (P = 0.01)

This model yielded the degree of variance explained, and tested the significance of the contribution from predictors to the variance in the PS. It also produced standardized coefficients (β) that estimated linear associations between neurocognitive variables and predictors.