Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Clin Biochem. 2012 Oct 12;50(0 1):62–69. doi: 10.1258/acb.2012.012066

Table 1.

Characteristics of reference and validation populations

Reference population (n = 1226) Child volunteers Normotensive volunteers Hypertensive subjects Patient group 1* Patient group 2*
N 116 317 258 331 204
Age (median and range) 13 (5–17) 36 (18–73) 48 (18–84) 39 (18–77) 50 (18–81)
Gender (F/M) 59/57 168/149 138/120 193/138 121/83
Validation population (n = 3888) Patients with phaeochromocytoma Patients without phaeochromocytoma
N 558 3330
Age (median and range) 44 (6–89) 54 (4–96)
Gender (F/M) (277/281) (1960/1367)
*

Group 1 represent patients tested because of an incidental mass found on imaging, an underlying germline mutation or a previous history of the tumour; patient group 2 represent patients tested because of signs and symptoms suggestive of phaeochromocytoma

For three patients there was no gender assignment