Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Clin Biochem. 2012 Oct 12;50(0 1):62–69. doi: 10.1258/acb.2012.012066

Table 3.

Diagnostic test performance of plasma metanephrines with different upper cut-offs and models adjusting for age

Model Upper cut-offs (nmol/L)
Test performance
NMN MN Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Fixed – 97.5 percentiles 0.706 0.325 93.9* 88.3*
Age-dependent linear model Variable 0.325 93.9* 91.2
Age-dependent curvilinear model Variable 0.325 93.7* 93.6§
Age-dependent curvilinear model Variable 0.446 93.6* 96.0¶
Age-adjusted score model NA NA 79.5 99.9#

NMN, normetanephrine; MN, metanephrine; NA, not applicable (based on a score)

Presence of different symbols (*†§¶#) indicates differences (P < 0.0003) in sensitivity or specificity among different models. Presence of the same symbol indicates no difference

Variable upper cut-offs for plasma NMN (UCNMN) for the age-dependent linear model were defined by the equation UCNMN = 7.99 × 10−3age + 0.358

Variable upper cut-offs for plasma NMN for the age-dependent curvilinear model were defined by the equation UCNMN = 2.07 × 10−6 age3 + 0.540 and are shown for two upper cut-offs for MN

The age-adjusted scored model is defined by the equation [−4.188 + −0.07age + 4.516MN + 3.129NMN] as described by Sawka et al.27