Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;106(11):1642–1650. doi: 10.1111/cas.12808

Table 2.

Association between miR‐1 ISH status and clinicopathological parameters in 163 breast carcinomas

Variable miR‐1 status P‐value
+ (= 32) − (= 131)
Agea(years) 56.5 ± 2.1 56.3 ± 1.1 0.93
Menopausal status
Premenopausal 12 49
Postmenopausal 20 82 0.76
Stage
I 3 65
II 7 41
III 8 17
IV 14 8 <0.0001
Pathological T factor (pT)
pT1 5 80
pT2‐4 27 51 <0.0001
Lymph node metastasis
Positive 24 49
Negative 8 82 0.0001
Distant metastasis
Positive 14 8
Negative 18 123 <0.0001
Histological grade
1 (well) 5 42
2 (moderate) 10 60
3 (poor) 17 29 <0.0001
ER status
Positive 19 106
Negative 13 25 0.0098
PR status
Positive 14 92
Negative 18 39 0.0049
HER2 status
Positive 6 21
Negative 26 110 0.71
Ki‐67 LIa (%) 26.8 ± 4.0 14.4 ± 1.1 <0.0001
a

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All other values represent the number of cases P‐values < 0.05 were considered significant, and are presented in bold.