Table 2.
Correlations between working memory and social relational factors
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. WM T1 | - | |||||||||||||
| 2. WM T2 | .55* | - | ||||||||||||
| 3. WM T3 | .44* | .59* | - | |||||||||||
| 4. TC conflict T1 | −.15* | −.16* | −.16* | - | ||||||||||
| 5. TC conflict T2 | −.15* | −.26* | −.26* | .39* | - | |||||||||
| 6. TC conflict T3 | −.16* | −.24* | −.23* | .25* | .37* | - | ||||||||
| 7. TC warmth T1 | −0.02 | 0.08* | 0.03 | −0.05 | −0.07 | −.13* | - | |||||||
| 8. TC warmth T2 | 0.06 | .16* | .12* | −.13* | −.17* | −.15* | .27* | - | ||||||
| 9. TC warmth T3 | 0.09* | .15* | .11* | −0.09* | −0.09* | −.21* | .21* | .18* | - | |||||
| 10. Likeability T1 | 0.09* | .15* | 0.09* | −0.07* | −.10* | −0.08* | .10* | 0.08* | 0.06 | - | ||||
| 11. Likeability T2 | .15* | .26* | .19* | −.10* | −.15* | −.14* | .16* | .11* | .10* | .46* | - | |||
| 12. Likeability T3 | .14* | .18* | .14* | −0.07 | −.17* | −.17* | 0.05 | 0.07* | .13* | .31* | .40* | - | ||
| 13. Friends T1 | .10* | 0.09* | 0.05 | −0.08* | −0.01 | −0.06 | 0.08* | 0.07 | 0.02 | .58* | .36* | .38* | - | |
| 14. Friends T2 | 0.08* | .16* | .17* | −0.03 | −.10* | −0.09* | .12* | .12* | .08* | .40* | .55* | .30* | .43* | - |
| 15. Friends T3 | .10* | 0.04 | 0.04 | −0.05 | −0.10* | −0.06 | .10* | 0.07* | 0.08* | .16* | .20* | .57* | .30* | .20* |
WM Working memory, TC Teacher-child relationship, T1 fall 2011, T2 = spring 2012, T3 spring 2013
* p < 0.05