Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 3;44(1):63–74. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-9974-1

Table 4.

Joint probabilities of narcissism and total bullying trajectories (upper panel) and mean resource control scores for the joint trajectory groups (bottom panel)

Narcissism Total bullying
High Medium Average Low
Joint probability of trajectory group membership a
 High 0.03(n = 7)/ – 0.04(n = 8)/ 0.005( n= 1) 0.01(n = 2)/ 0.03( n= 5) 0.02(n = 4)/0.05( n= 9)
 Medium 0.09(n = 18)/0.02( n= 4) 0.19(n = 37)/0.08( n= 15) 0.13(n = 25)/0.14( n= 28) 0.11(n = 21)/0.18( n= 35)
 Low 0.06(n = 12)/0.01( n= 2) 0.09(n = 17)/0.08( n= 16) 0.09(n = 17)/0.16( n= 32) 0.13(n = 25)/0.26( n= 51)
Total bullying
High Medium Average Low
Mean score on resource control over time b
 High narcissism (N b = 21; N g = 15) 0.93 (0.50)/ – 0.38 (0.77)/ 0.24 (N/A) −0.60 (0.64) /−0.24(1.01) −0.57(1.05)/−0.47 (0.81)
 Medium narcissism (N b = 101; N g = 74) 0.86 (0.68)/ 1.40 (0.32) 0.40 (0.66)/ 0.75 (0.55) −0.25 (0.72) / 0.24 (0.67) −0.66 (0.73) /−0.37 (0.62)
 Low narcissism (N b = 71; N g = 101) 0.56 (0.62)/1.12(1.02) −0.12 (0.61)/ 0.47 (0.75) −0.31 (0.73) / 0.13 (0.51) −0.42 (0.69) /−0.48 (0.53)

a Cells sum to 1. b Figures in bold pertain to girls; figures between parentheses are SD’s