Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: FEBS J. 2015 Oct 26;282(24):4766–4781. doi: 10.1111/febs.13533

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of proliferation rates in RAX knockdown cell lines.

Cell line shRNA Proliferation rate
(h−1, mean ± SEM)		 p value
(compared to NT)
Non-targeting control 0.01903 ± 0.00102 –
αT3 RAX (1199) 0.00489 ± 0.00180 < 0.0001
RAX (1459) 0.01381 ± 0.00126 0.0089
Non-targeting control 0.01815 ± 0.00163 –
LβT2 RAX (1199) 0.00032 ± 0.004215 0.0076
RAX (1459) 0.01067 ± 0.00154 0.0233

Proliferation rate of αT3 and LβT2 cells stably expressing one of two RAX shRNAs (1199 or 1459) or non-targeting control (Figure 3B). Results are shown as mean ± SEM, αT3 NT (n=7), 1199 (n=5), 1459 (n=5), LβT2 NT (n=4), 1199 (n=4), 1459 (n=3). p values are derived from an unpaired two-tailed t-test of RAX shRNA infected cells compared to corresponding non-targeting controls.