Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Oct 12;24(12):1313–1320. doi: 10.1002/pds.3887

Table 2.

Comparison of percent adherence values calculated from raw and adjusted medication event monitoring system (MEMS) data

Adherence Variables Mean (SD) % Median (IQR) % P-valuea Multiple Comparisonb
Raw 91.2 (22.5) 101.6 (91.9–103.2) A
Cleaned 89.5 (22.5) 100.0 (90.3–101.6) < 0.001 B
Capped 87.7 (22.1) 98.4 (87.1–100) < 0.001 C
Clean-capped 88.7 (22.0) 100 (90.3–100) < 0.001 C
a

Wilcoxon signed-rank test,

b

Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn’s test for all comparisons between raw, cleaned, capped, and clean-capped percent adherence values. All pair-wise comparisons occur simultaneously. Letters indicate significant differences. A- raw is different from cleaned, capped and clean-capped. B-cleaned is different from capped. C-capped is not different from clean-capped.