Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;27:367–376. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3386-5

Table 1.

Summary of meta-analysis results for calcium plus vitamin D supplementation versus placebo and fracture risk

Reference Status Vitamin D (IU/day) Calcium (mg/day) No. of total fracture events/total No. of hip fracture events/total
RR (95 % CI) Treatment Control RR (95 % CI) Treatment Control
Chapuy et al. [20] Institutionalized 800 1200 0.74 (0.56–0.97) 80/1387 110/1403 0.74 (0.56–0.97) 21/1387 37/1403
Chapuy et al. [21] Institutionalized 800 1200 0.62 (0.36–1.07) 27/393 21/190 0.62 (0.36–1.07) 27/393 21/190
Dawson-Hughes et al. [22] Community-dwelling 700 500 0.46 (0.23–0.90) 11/187 26/202 0.36 (0.01–8.77) 0/187 1/202
Porthouse et al. [23] Community-dwelling 800 1000 1.01 (0.71–1.43) 58/1321 91/1993 0.75 (0.31–1.80) 8/1321 17/1993
Prentice et al. [10]a Community-dwelling 400 1000 0.90 (0.78–1.03) 405/7530b 458/7801b 0.55 (0.32–0.97) 19/7530b 35/7406b
Salovaara et al. [24] Community-dwelling 800 1000 0.83 (0.61–1.12) 78/1586 94/1609 2.02 (0.37–11.02) 4/1586 2/1609
Grant et al. [25] Community-dwelling with history of fracture 800 1000 1.02 (0.89–1.16) 387/2649 377/2643 ND ND ND
Harwood et al. [26] Community-dwelling with history of fracture 800 1000 0.57 (0.15–2.19) 3/39 5/37 ND ND ND

CI confidence interval, ND no data, RR relative risk, WHI Women’s Health Initiative

aData analyzing the WHI for adherence to assigned pills and no personal use of supplements from Table 6 in Prentice et al. [10]

bData provided from WHI investigators