Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 30;76(2):206–215. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0295

Table 1.

Demographics of asbestos-exposed MM cases and controls.

No. Mean age at Dx* Latency Histology (%)** MM location (%)*** Gender (% M vs. F) Cancer score
BAP1-mutant MM cases 9 57.9 ± 10.7 44.5 ± 9.9 88.9/11.1/0/0 44.4/55.6 77.8/22.2 3.00 ± 1.22
WT BAP1 MM cases 141 68.2 ± 10.9 50.9 ± 11.2 73.8/9.9/13.5/2.8 82.3/17.7 75.2/24.8 2.4 ± 0.95
Significance: BAP1-mutant vs. WT BAP1 MM controls p < 0.01 NS NS p < 0.05 NS NS
Controls: asbestosis +/− pleural plaques 153 74.6 ± 4.9 54.4 ± 3.7 92.2/7.8
Controls: High cancer score without MM 50 72.8 ± 9.8 86.0/14.0 4.34 ± 1.46
*

For controls, age at time that blood sample was collected.

**

Epithelioid/biphasic/sarcomatous/unknown

***

% pleural/% peritoneal

Key: WT, wild-type (normal) BAP1 status; Dx, diagnosis; M, male; F, female