Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 21;22(3):1260–1278. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1260

Table 2.

Effect of erythromycin on the pharmacokinetic parameters of quinine and 3-hydroxyquinine in healthy subjects and cirrhotic patients

Parameter Healthy subjects
Patients with cirrhosis
Child A
Child C
Placebo Erythromycin Placebo Erythromycin Placebo Erythromycin
CL quinine 1.775 ± 0.310 1.161 ± 0.309a 1.504 ± 0.362 1.040 ± 0.303a 1.281 ± 0.394b 1.401 ± 0.534
Inhibition (%) 33 (27-38) 30 (26-34) -7 (-16-2)f
CLf 3-hydroxiquinine 0.174 ± 0.051 0.059 ± 0.017c 0.140 ± 0.077 0.056 ± 0.032c 0.085 ± 0.028d 0.037 ± 0.023c
Inhibition (%) 65 (61-70) 61 (56-67) 59 (46-72)
Unbound quinine (%) 6.7 ± 0.8 9.4 ± 1.0c 7.1 ± 1.6 10.3 ± 2.8c 11.9 ± 3.7f 19.9 ± 5.5cf
Increase (%) 41 (28-55) 45 (33-55) 76 (42-111)b
CLu quinine 26.81 ± 11.49 12.30 ± 3.16c 21.18 ± 8.45 10.10 ± 3.88c 10.95 ± 2.19f 7.24 ± 2.77bc
Inhibition (%) 51 (44-59) 50 (45-55) 35 (21-48)b
CLuf 3-hydroxiquinine 2.63 ± 0.88 0.64 ± 0.20c 1.97 ± 1.09 0.55 ± 0.31c 7.01 ± 3.33f 4.06 ± 2.58ad
Inhibition (%) 75 (70-80) 73 (70-77) 74 (64-84)
Erythromycin Css 1.33 ± 0.25 1.18 ± 0.44 1.85 ± 1.00

Data are taken or calculated from Orlando et al[47]; all clearance values are expressed as mL/min per kg; inhibition or increase values are given as means with 95% confidence limits.

a

P < 0.01,

c

P < 0.001 vs placebo;

b

P < 0.05 vs healthy subjects and patients with Child grade A cirrhosis;

d

P < 0.001 vs healthy subjects and P < 0.05 vs patients with Child grade A cirrhosis;

f

P < 0.001 vs healthy subjects and patients with Child grade A cirrhosis. CL: Systemic clearance; CLf: Formation clearance; CLu: Unbound systemic clearance; CLuf: Unbound formation clearance; Css: Steady-state trough concentration (μg/mL).