Table 1.
Study | Year | Eligibility | Procedure | LND extent | No. of patient (LAG/OG) | Operative time | Blood loss | No. of retrieved LN | Hospital stay | Morbidity | Mortality |
Kitano et al[1] | 2002 | cT1 | LADG/ODG | Not mentioned | 14/14 | ODG | LADG | Equivalent | Equivalent | Equivalent | Equivalent |
Fujii et al[15] | 2003 | cT1 | LADG/ODG | Not mentioned | 10/10 | ODG | Equivalent | NE | NE | Equivalent | Equivalent |
Hayashi et al[16] | 2005 | cT1 | LADG/ODG | Not mentioned | 14/14 | ODG | Equivalent | Equivalent | LADG | NE | Equivalent |
Huscher et al[17] | 2005 | cT1-4N0-2 | TLDG/ODG | D1, D2 | 30/29 | Equivalent | TLDG | Equivalent | TLDG | Equivalent | Equivalent |
Lee et al[18] | 2005 | cT1 | LADG/ODG | D2 | 24/23 | ODG | Equivalent | Equivalent | Equivalent | LADG | NE |
Kim et al[19] | 2008 | cT1N0-1 | LADG/ODG | D1, D2 | 82/82 | ODG | LADG | ODG | LADG | NE | NE |
Kim et al[11] | 2010 | cT1-2N0-1 | LADG/ODG | D1 + beta, D2 | 179/163 | ODG | LADG | NE | NE | Equivalent | Equivalent |
Cai et al[14] | 2011 | cT2-3 | LAG/OG (DG, TG, PG) | D2 | 49/47 | OG | Equivalent | Equivalent | Equivalent | Equivalent | NE |
Sakuramoto et al[20] | 2013 | cT1 | LADG/ODG | D1+beta | 31/32 | ODG | LADG | Equivalent | Equivalent | Equivalent | NE |
Takiguchi et al[21] | 2013 | cTNMI | LADG/ODG | D1, D2 | 20/20 | ODG | LADG | Equivalent | LADG | NE | NE |
Aoyama et al[22] | 2014 | cTNMI | LADG/ODG | D1 + beta, D2 | 13/13 | ODG | LADG | Equivalent | NE | Equivalent | Equivalent |
LND: Lymph node dissection; LADG: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy; TLDG: Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy; ODG: Open distal gastrectomy; LAG; Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy; OG: Open gastrectomy; DG: Distal gastrectomy; TG: Total gastrectomy; PG: Proximal gastrectomy; LN: Lymph node; NE: Not evaluated. Favored group in each value were shown.