Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 25;4(4):252–259. doi: 10.1159/000442047

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical features according to the route of detection of thyroid cancer

Variable Palpation group (n = 91) Screening group (n = 35) p value
Age (mean ± SD), years 16 ± 3 17 ±2 0.79
Female, n (%) 79 (87) 31 (89) 0.79
History of radiation, n (%) 3 (3) 1 (3) 0.90
Histology, n (%) 0.75
 Papillary 82 (90) 33 (94)
  Classic 73 (80) 29 (83)
  Follicular 2 (2) 1 (3)
  Diffuse sclerosing 5 (6) 3 (8)
  Cribriform-morular 2 (2) 0
 Follicular 7 (8) 1 (3)
 Medullary 0 1 (3)
 Poorly differentiated 2 (2) 0
Median mass size, cm 2.8 0.9 <0.001
Mass size, n (%)
 <0.5 cm 0 5 (14)
 0.5 – 0.9 cm 4 (4) 18 (52)
 1.0 – 1.9 cm 15 (17) 11 (31)
 ≥2.0 cm 72 (79) 1 (3)
T stage, n (%) <0.001
 T1 12 (13) 23 (66)
 T2 13 (14) 0
 T3 32 (35) 6 (17)
 T4 34 (38) 6 (17)
N stage, n (%)
 N0 23 (25) 20 (57) <0.001
 N1a 30 (33) 11 (32)
 N1b 38 (42) 4 (11)
Extrathyroidal extension, n (%)
 None 29 (32) 23 (66) 0.001
 Minimal 28 (31) 6 (17)
 Gross 34 (37) 6 (17)
Distant metastasis at presentation, n (%) 10 (11) 0 0.001

TNM stage was described according to the 7th edition of the TNM/AJCC system.