Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 15;10(2):177–181. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.177

Table 2.

Correlation between expression of NF-κBP65 protein, hTERT mRNA and protein and clinicopathological features

Factor Cases NF-κB hTERT hTERT
P65 (%) mRNA (%) protein (%)
Gender
Male 30 16 (53.33) 24 (80.00) 24 (80.00)
Female 11 9 (81.82) 11 (100.00) 8 (72.73)
Age (years)
< 60 24 14 (58.33) 21 (87.50) 20 (83.33)
≥ 60 17 11 (64.71) 14 (82.35) 12 (70.59)
Histology (type)
Intestinal 16 7 (43.75) 12 (75.00) 10 (62.50)
Differentiation 25 18 (72.00) 23 (92.00) 22 (88.00)
Differentiation
Well 13 3 (23.08)b 9 (69.23) 7 (53.85)a
Poor 28 22 (78.57) 26 (92.86) 25 (89.29)
Lymph node metastasis
Negative 16 4 (25.00)b 12 (75.00) 9 (56.25)a
Positive 25 21 (84.00) 23 (92.00) 23 (92.00)
Stage
Early 12 2 (16.67)b 7 (58.33)b 5 (41.67)b
Advanced 29 23 (79.31) 28 (96.55) 27 (93.10)
Tumor size (cm)
< 5 19 6 (31.58)b 14 (73.68) 13 (68.42)
≥ 5 22 19 (86.36) 21 (95.45) 19 (86.36)
Depth of invasion
m, sm 10 2 (20.00)a 6 (60.00) 4 (40.00)a
ms, ss 17 11 (64.71) 16 (94.12) 15 (88.24)
se, si 14 12 (85.71) 13 (92.86) 13 (92.86)
a

P < 0.05,

b

P < 0.01, From comparison in each group of clinicopatho-logic feature by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. m: mucosa, sm: submucosa, mp: muscularis propria, ss: subserosa, se: inva-sion to serosa, si: invasion to other organ. Tumor size was de-fined as the largest size in extension on the gastric mucosa.