Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 15;10(2):273–278. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.273

Table 3.

Utilization and costs of diagnostic procedures related to gastroenterological diseases among cohorts (n = 183 976) in 2001: top 20 by total cost

Item of diagnostic proceduresa No. of patients No. of orders Total cost
US $ % Cum.%
Whole body computer 2 541 3 092 374 106 19.7% 19.7%
tomography (without contrast)
Abdominal sonography 11 132 15 730 349 690 18.4% 38.1%
Whole body computer tomography 1 644 2 106 320 943 16.9% 55.0%
(with/without contrast)
Upper GI panendoscopy 4 693 5 606 247 458 13.0% 68.0%
Serum GPT 25 427 47 523 69 765 3.7% 71.7%
Serum GOT 24 265 45 653 67 676 3.6% 75.2%
Whole body computer 337 437 59 522 3.1% 78.3%
tomography (with contrast)
Colon fiberoscopy 730 780 50 698 2.7% 81.0%
Double-contrast study 421 432 29 421 1.5% 82.6%
of lower GI series
AFP (RIA) 1 461 2 408 28 361 1.5% 84.1%
AFP (EIA) 2 363 3 570 20 86 1.1% 85.2%
Plain abdomen X-ray 2 338 2 856 18 498 1.0% 86.1%
Serum bilirubin, total 6 345 12 553 18 307 1.0% 87.1%
HbsAg (EIA) 3 678 3 999 17 237 0.9% 88.0%
Serum albumin 6 989 14 638 15 522 0.8% 88.8%
CEA (EIA) 856 1 308 15 293 0.8% 89.6%
Alkaline phosphatase 5 686 10 091 14 159 0.7% 90.4%
Upper GI series 296 315 13 347 0.7% 91.1%
CEA (RIA) 647 1 127 13 344 0.7% 91.8%
Sigmoid fiberoscopy 311 327 11 620 0.6% 92.4%
Others 144 922 7.6% 100.0%
Totalb 36 004 210 156 1 900 752 100.0%
a

Magnet resonance imaging (MRI) was excluded from analy-sis because the fee schedule of the National Health Insurance did not differentiate MRI for abdomen from MRI for other body parts.

b

Numbers might not add to totals because of rounding.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure