Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):e37–e51. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000207

TABLE 2.

Mixed effects models examining looks to the competitor object for the voiced (b/p) continua

Effect B SE T df P
Voiced (/b/)
    rStep 0.014 0.003 4.8 77.6 <0.0001*
    rStep2 0.007 0.003 2.2 43.5 0.035*
    CI vs. NH 0.031 0.008 4.1 50.5 0.0001*
    CIE vs. CIAE –0.007 0.010 –0.7 47.6 0.49
    Unrelated looks (covariate) 0.312 0.063 4.9 725.9 <0.0001*
    rStep × CI vs. NH 0.009 0.006 1.5 83.0 0.15
    rStep × CIE vs. CIAE 0.019 0.008 2.5 65.3 0.014*
    rStep2 × CI vs. NH 0.000 0.007 0.1 47.9 0.95
    rStep2 × CIE vs. CIAE 0.022 0.009 2.5 43.6 0.015*
Voiceless (/p/)
    rStep –0.004 0.001 –4.3 44.9 <0.0001*
    CI vs. NH 0.030 0.006 5.2 51.8 <0.0001*
    CIE vs. CIAE –0.008 0.008 –1.1 50.1 0.29
    Unrelated looks (covariate) 0.207 0.042 4.9 1596 <0.0001*
    rStep × CI vs. NH 0.000 0.002 0.0 43.7 0.99
    rStep × CIE vs. CIAE 0.002 0.003 0.9 46.8 0.36
*

P < .05.

CI indicates cochlear implant; NH, normal hearing.