Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):e37–e51. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000207

TABLE 3.

Results of two linear mixed models examining competitor looks for the fricative continua

Effect B SE T df P
Postalveolar
    rStep 0.019 0.003 6.2 95.9 <0.0001*
    CI vs. NH 0.031 0.008 3.8 50.3 0.0003*
    CIE vs. CIAE 0.027 0.011 2.5 52.3 0.016*
    Unrelated looks (covariate) 0.448 0.082 5.5 902.4 <0.0001*
    rStep × CI vs. NH 0.001 0.006 0.2 87.7 0.84
    rStep × CIE vs. CIAE 0.010 0.008 1.2 105.9 0.24
Alveolar
    rStep –0.007 0.002 –4.5 58.0 <0.0001*
    rStep2 0.005 0.001 5.1 68.3 <0.0001*
    CI vs. NH 0.040 0.010 4.1 53.1 0.0002*
    CIE vs. CIAE 0.023 0.013 1.8 51.5 0.082
    Unrelated looks (covariate) 0.158 0.064 2.4 1468 0.014*
    rStep × CI vs. NH 0.006 0.003 1.8 58.6 0.073
    rStep × CIE vs. CIAE 0.004 0.004 0.9 52.8 0.38
    rStep2 × CI vs. NH –0.002 0.002 –0.9 69.9 0.36
    rStep2 × CIE vs. CIAE 0.000 0.003 –0.1 58.9 0.92
*

P < .05

P < .01.

CI indicates cochlear implant; NH, normal hearing.