Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0147332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147332

Table 4. Raw and TICV corrected neuroanatomical regions of interest for PD and non-PD peers with mean± standard deviation, and minimum/maximum scores shown).

Significance noted by *.

PD (n = 40) Non-PD (n = 40)
Cortical
 Prefrontal 2.32±0.09, 2.11/2.56 2.31±0.08, 2.06/2.51
Thickness (mm)
 Temporal 2.64±0.09, 2.39/2.82 2.67±0.07, 2.49/2.81*
 Parietal 2.24±0.09, 2.09/2.41 2.23±0.09, 2.03/2.38
White Matter
 Prefrontal 0.33±0.03, 0.25/0.38 0.33±0.02, 0.28/0.37
Mean FA
 Temporal 0.30±0.02, 0.24/0.34 0.30±0.02, 0.21/0.34
 Parietal 0.34±0.02, 0.28/0.38 0.35±0.02, 0.30/0.38
Subcortical
 Caudate raw 7367±1164, 4754/10082 7086±992, 5452/10455
Raw mm3
 Putamen raw 9875±1148, 7958/13563 10221±1057, 8359/12570
 Thalamus raw 13937±1313, 11294/18378 13120±1319, 10286/16222**
Subcortical
 % Caudate 0.43± 0.06, 0.30/0.55 0.44±0.05, 0.34/0.58
TICV correcteda
 % Putamen 0.507± 0.07, 0.44/0.72 0.64±0.06, 0.53/0.82**
 % Thalamus 0.81±0.07, 0.64/0.97 0.82±0.08, 0.64/0.99
TICV cm3 1727±1698, 1416/2082 1603±1377, 1371/1881**

**p < .01;

*trend at p = .05;

aBilateral subcortical structures corrected for total intracranial volume x 100. TICV = Total intracranial Volume in cm3. Using the non-PD mean and standard deviation TICV values, standardized z-scores indicated that 11/40 (27.5%) of the PD participants had a TICV at least one standard deviation above the control mean TICV, three (7.50%) individuals at least two standard deviations, and three (7.50%) at least three standard deviations larger than the control mean. For these reasons, subcortical volume structures are corrected for TICV. FSL/FIRST [82] subcortical values were not statistically different from FreeSurfer [81] with intraclass correlation > 0.85.