Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0146769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146769

Table 3. Arousal and Valence Effects: Means of Signal Detection Parameters and Median Reaction Times for Participants with Good Model Fit.

HR FAR d’ RTHit RTCR
1-day
Arousal Analysis (N = 38)
High .71 (.13) .30 (.08) 1.14 (.48) 1,266 (577) 1,377 (398)
Low .64 (.16) .31 (.05) .88 (.53) 1,197 (374) 1,276 (378)
Valence Analysis (N = 37)
Negative .71 (.15) .49 (.04) .62 (.45) 1,161 (285) 1,259(272)
Positive .67 (.13) .13 (.11) 1.75 (.74) 1.195 (353) 1,240 (280)
7-day
Arousal Analysis (N = 34)
High .68(.14) .50 (.07) .48 (.37) 1,236 (271) 1,372(427)
Low .61 (.14) .15 (.10) 1.42 (.45) 1,250 (276) 1,257 (315)
Valence Analysis (N = 37)
Negative .68 (.13) .48 (.06) .55 (.36) 1,259 (272) 1,379 (404)
Positive .61 (.14) .18 (.13) 1.36 (.49) 1,240 (280) 1,329 (402)

Note: HR = hit rate; FAR = false alarm rate; d’ = discriminability index; RTHit = reaction time for hits; RTCR = reaction time for correct rejections. 1-day = 1-day study-test lag; 7-day = 7-day study-test lag. Standard deviations are in parentheses. Outlier RTs were removed before the calculation of these values.