Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 15.

Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2015 Sep 30;93:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.09.026

Table 2.

Success rates of binding ligand prediction methods benchmarked on Kahraman set.

	Top 1 prediction (%)	Top 3 prediction (%)
	Kahraman Set

PL-PatchSurfer	48.2	82.7
PL-PatchSurfer (w/o H-bond)	44.7	80.7
PatchSurfer^a	45.5	87.0
PocketSurfer^b	36.1	81.5

	Chikhi Set

PL-PatchSurfer	44.4	75.0
eF-Seek^b	19.4	36.1
SitesBase^b	32.2	60.0

^a.

The success rates are taken from [28].

^b.

The success rates are taken from [70].