Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2015 Oct 21;50(2):171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.015

Table 2.

Predicted Mean Nutritional Profile of PFPs Purchased by Households from Walmart and Other FRCs by Household Incomea

Other FRCs
PFPs
Energy density (kcal/100 g) Sugar density (g/100 g)
Higher income Low income Higher income Low income
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)




 2000 119 (119,120) 125 (122,128) 8.4 (8.3,8.4) 9.0 (8.7,9.3)
 2013 108 (108,109) 114 (111,116) 6.7 (6.6,6.7) 7.0 (6.8,7.2)
 Differenceb −11 −11 −1.7 −2.0

Saturated fat density (g/100 g) Sodium density (mg/100 g)
Higher income Low income Higher income Low income
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)




 2000 1.6 (1.5,1.6) 1.7 (1.6,1.8) 205 (204,206) 209 (202,215)
 2013 1.5 (1.5,1.6) 1.6 (1.5,1.7) 185 (183,206) 208 (203,213)
 Difference −0.1 −0.1 −20 −1
Walmart PFPs
Energy density (kcal/100 g) Sugar density (g/100 g)
Higher income Low income Higher income Low income
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)




 2000 200 (195,204) 190 (175,205) 15.7 (15.2,16.2) 14.6 (12.5,16.6)
 2013 124 (122,126) 127 (120,134) 7.7 (7.4,7.9) 8.4 (7.7,9.2)
 Difference −76 −63 −8.0 −6.2

Saturated fat density (g/100 g) Sodium density (mg/100 g)
Higher income Low income Higher income Low income
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)




 2000 2.8 (2.7,2.9) 2.8 (2.5,3.2) 231 (225,238) 231 (210,252)
 2013 1.6 (1.5,1.6) 1.6 (1.5,1.8) 198 (194,201) 200 (190,210)
 Difference −1.2 −1.2 −33 −31

Source: Calculations based in part on data reported by Nielsen through its Homescan Services for the food and beverage categories for the U.S. market. ©2013, The Nielsen Company.

a

Household income categorized as higher income (income >130% the federal poverty level [FPL]) or low income (income ≤ 130% FPL)

b

Difference between 2013 and 2000, within income group

Note: Boldface indicates that the predicted mean nutrient density was different between higher income vs. low income households, within retailer and year, p≤0.05. For rows indicating the difference between 2013 and 2000, Boldface indicates that changes in the predicted mean nutrient density of PFPs purchased by low-income households was different than changes in the predicted mean nutrient density of PFPs purchased by higher-income households.

PFP, packaged food purchases; FRC, food retail chains