Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2016 Jan 6;29(1):125–131. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00474

Table 2.

Method Validation Parameters for Measuring Carbonyls in Tobacco Smoke

accuracy (n = 3) relative standard
deviation (n = 30)


analyte calibration standard range (µg) low medium high smoke matrix effecta (n = 3) LOD (µg) (n = 7) 3R4F ISOb 3R4F CIc
formaldehyde 5–300 106% 102% 99% 0% 2.4 19% 19%
acetaldehyde 50–3000 90% 100% 98% −1.3% 2.7 10% 12%
acetone 25–1500 102% 99% 95% 3.1% 6.4 14% 14%
acrolein 5–300 100% 103% 95% −7.5% 0.1 10% 13%
propionaldehyde 5–300 83% 102% 103% −2.4% 0.6 13% 16%
crotonaldehyde 2.5–150 101% 101% 96% −3.6% 0.2 12% 13%
methyl ethyl ketone 5–300 104% 93% 96% −7.8% 0.3 14% 13%
a

Matrix effects were assessed by comparing slopes of calibration curves prepared from two set of standards. One set was prepared neat, and the second set was prepared with smoke matrices present. “+” or “−” indicates a matrix-enhanced or -suppressed effect, respectively.

b

ISO (35 mL puff volume, 60 s puff interval, 2 s puff duration, and filter-tip vent open).

c

CI (55 mL puff volume, 30 s puff interval, 2 s puff duration, and 100% vent block).