Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: Mar Chem. 2015 Dec 20;177(Pt 5):721–730. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.10.012

Table 1.

Ratios of water column suspended particle:sediment MeHg and water column dissolved:sediment pore water MeHg for sites sampled in 2009 and data from literature sources. Arranged from higher to lower ratios within each study.

Site Suspended particle:sediment MeHg Site Dissolved:pore water MeHg Reference
LIS-W 0.202 Current study
WH 46.3 LIS-E 0.103
MC 9.95 MC 0.096
WD 2.85 BB 0.066
BB 1.62 WD 0.051
JEL 0.632 WH 0.050
LIS-W1 0.496 PNS 0.043
PNS 0.486 JEL 0.023
LIS-E1 0.157 WM 0.016
Buzzards Bay (MA) 21.7 Chen et al., 2014
Barn Island (CT) 11.1
Waquoit (MA) 10.7
Jamaica Bay (NY) 4.71
Providence (RI) 1.56
Hackensack (NJ) 0.579
Wells (ME) 0.330
Old Saybrook (CT) 0.241
Portsmouth (NH) 0.185
Milford (CT) 0.113
NY/NJ Harbor (2002) 1.15 0.007 Balcom et al., 2008
1.14 0.005 Hammerschmidt et al., 2008
1.01 0.004
0.749 0.004
Hudson R. ETM (2001) 1.39 0.651 Heyes et al., 2004
Delaware R. ETM (2012) 1.33 0.603 Mason et al., 2014
0.750 0.383
0.773 0.327
Mesocosm Experiment 16.22 Kim et al., 2006
6.22
2.83
1.53

Notes:

1

LIS water column MeHg data from Schartup et al. (2015)

2

no sediment resuspension;

3

resuspended sediment