Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Stat Data Anal. 2013 Nov;67:199–212. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.011

Table 2. Sine curve model: results of parameter estimates using the true model, proposed model and Cox PH model.

α1 α2 angle (β̂,β0)



bias SD SEE CP bias SD SEE CP mean SD
N = 1000, censoring rate = 80%, 200 cases

true model 0.005 0.104 0.097 0.934 -0.001 0.125 0.123 0.942 2.563 1.418
plSI 0.088 0.191 0.168 0.938 -0.177 0.326 0.297 0.940 2.748 1.465
Cox PH -0.304 0.132 0.108 0.252 0.617 0.192 0.172 0.132 4.356 2.633

N = 2000, censoring rate = 80%, 400 cases

true model 0.002 0.068 0.068 0.948 -0.006 0.088 0.086 0.952 1.755 0.915
plSI 0.039 0.116 0.110 0.940 -0.080 0.201 0.194 0.954 1.848 0.957
Cox PH -0.322 0.076 0.074 0.024 0.644 0.124 0.118 0.006 3.043 1.658

N = 1000, censoring rate = 90%, 100 cases

true model -0.003 0.146 0.141 0.938 -0.007 0.178 0.180 0.960 3.961 2.206
plSI 0.214 0.309 0.286 0.932 -0.446 0.553 0.518 0.944 4.114 2.376
Cox PH -0.278 0.180 0.161 0.502 0.552 0.302 0.260 0.394 6.035 3.520

N = 2000, censoring rate = 90%, 200 cases

true model 0.002 0.103 0.097 0.930 -0.002 0.121 0.124 0.962 2.627 1.368
plSI 0.084 0.182 0.167 0.944 -0.168 0.324 0.295 0.938 2.702 1.415
Cox PH -0.310 0.120 0.108 0.232 0.618 0.184 0.173 0.116 4.266 2.405

bias: empirical bias; SD: sample standard deviation; SEE: standard error estimate; CP: empirical coverage probability of 95% confidence interval; N: cohort size; plSI: partially linear single index model.