Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 28;113(2):350–355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518648113

Table S1.

Efficiencies of primers used for all assays

Primer set Primer sequences, forward and reverse, 5′ to 3′ R2 Efficiency Slope 95% confidence interval
Drosophila
 Intact CGACAGCATTCCTGCGTAGTAAGA 0.995 106.6% −3.34 < s < −3.01
ACAATGCAAATTGCCCCTTA
 Depurinated CGACAGCATTCCTGCGTAGTAAGT 0.997 101.4% −3.44 < s < −3.13
ACAATGCAAATTGCCCCTTA
 Normalizer CAAGGACATTGCCAGGTAGG 0.997 102.7% −3.40 < s < −3.12
AGCTTTTGCTGTCCCTGTGT
Howardula
 Intact TGATAGTAATCCTGCTTAGTAAGA 0.997 98.0% −3.52 < s < −3.22
CACCGGAGAGCAACGATATT
 Depurinated TGATAGTAATCCTGCTTAGTAAGT 0.998 105.4% −3.32 < s < −3.08
CACCGGAGAGCAACGATATT
 Normalizer CAAATGCCTCGTCGGATG 0.991 92.1% −3.81 < s < −3.24
GCCAAAGCCTCCCACTTATAC
Rabbit
 Intact GGGTTTAGACCGTCGTGAGA 0.998 79.6% −4.03 < s < −3.83
AGTGGAACCGCAGGTTCAGA
 Depurinated GGGTTTAGACCGTCGTGAGA 0.997 78.9% −4.13 < s < −3.80
TGTGGAACCGCAGGTTCAGA
 Normalizer CGTTGGATTGTTCACCCACT 0.999 96.4% −3.48 < s < −3.33
CATACACCAAATGTCTGAACCTG

Efficiency and specificity were validated on standard curves of 5 × 10-fold serial dilutions of synthetic DNA (IDT gBlocks) for all primer sets, except for the primer pair for the Howardula normalizing primer set, which was tested using a dilution series of cDNA reverse-transcribed from Howardula-infected flies. Bases specific to sites of depurination are in bold, and deliberate mismatches are underlined.