Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2016 Feb;17(2):145–156. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0593-4

Table 3.

Relative odds of suicide attempt in relation to peer social preference scores, estimated using Discrete Time Survival Analysis (n=1385)

Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c

Relative odds estimate 95% CI p-Value Relative odds estimate 95% CI p-Value Relative odds estimate 95% CI p-Value
Social Preference 0.80 (0.67-0.96) 0.014** 0.79 (0.66-0.94) 0.007** 0.81 (0.68-0.96) 0.017**
Gender
    Male - - - 1.00 1.00
    Female - - - 1.81 (1.24-2.65) 0.002** 1.84 (1.25-2.71) 0.002**
Race
    Non-Black - - - 1.00 1.00
    Black - - - 0.32 (0.14-0.71) 0.005** 0.30 (0.13-0.69) 0.004**
Free or partially subsidized lunch
    No - - - 1.00 1.00
    Yes - - - 0.82 (0.49-1.37) 0.453 0.78 (0.46-1.31) 0.344
Cohort
    1 (1985-1986) - - - 1.00 1.00
    2 (1986-1987) - - - 0.64 (0.44-0.93) 0.020** 0.56 (0.34-0.91) 0.021**
Intervention
    Control - - - 1.00 1.00
    GBG 0.63 (0.34-1.16) 0.135 0.65 (0.35-1.20) 0.166
    ML - - - 0.80 (0.42-1.52) 0.504 0.79 (0.41-1.49) 0.463
Depressive symptoms - - - - - 1.45 (0.76-2.74) 0.260
Assaultive trauma
    No - - - - - - 1.00
    Yes - - - - - - 2.50 (1.69-3.68) <.001***
    Missing - - - - - - 0.81 (0.29-2.25) 0.684
a

Unadjusted.

b

Adjusted for gender, race, free or subsidized lunch status, cohort, and randomized intervention assignment.

c

Adjusted for all variables in Model 2 as well as average depressive symptoms in grades 1 -3 and lifetime report of assaultive trauma.

* p<0.10

**

p<0.05

***

p<0.001