Table 4.
Model 4a | Model 5b | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not Highly Aggressive (n=875) | Highly Aggressive (n=510) | (n=1385) | |||||||
Relative odds estimate | 95% CI | p-Value | Relative odds estimate | 95% CI | p-Value | Relative odds estimate | 95% CI | p-Value | |
Social Preference | 0.95 | (0.72-1.25) | 0.702 | 0.72 | (0.53-0.98) | 0.038** | 0.94 | (0.72-1.23) | 0.667 |
Highly Aggressive | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.05 | (0.64-1.71) | 0.859 |
Social Preference X Highly Aggressivec | - | - | - | - | - | 0.76 | (0.51-1.13) | 0.175 | |
Gender | |||||||||
Male | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Female | 1.41 | (0.84-2.38) | 0.194 | 2.68 | (1.44-4.97) | 0.002** | 1.88 | (1.26-2.81) | 0.002** |
Race | |||||||||
Non-Black | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Black | 0.50 | (0.16-1.61) | 0.246 | 0.16 | (0.04-0.62) | 0.008** | 0.30 | (0.13-0.69) | 0.005** |
Free or partially subsidized lunch | |||||||||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Yes | 0.65 | (0.32-1.34) | 0.246 | 0.84 | (0.37-1.92) | 0.686 | 0.77 | (0.46-1.30) | 0.332 |
Cohort | |||||||||
1 (1985-1986) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
2 (1986-1987) | 0.51 | (0.27-0.99) | 0.046** | 0.66 | (0.29-1.46) | 0.304 | 0.54 | (0.33-0.90) | 0.018** |
Intervention | |||||||||
Control | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
GBG | 0.77 | (0.34-1.75) | 0.534 | 0.63 | (0.22-1.75) | 0.372 | 0.66 | (0.36-1.24) | 0.197 |
ML | 0.63 | (0.28-1.40) | 0.252 | 1.19 | (0.35-4.11) | 0.781 | 0.78 | (0.41-1.49) | 0.453 |
Depressive symptoms | 1.75 | (0.76-4.04) | 0.190 | 1.04 | (0.37-2.92) | 0.948 | 1.50 | (0.78-2.88) | 0.222 |
Assaultive trauma | |||||||||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Yes | 2.95 | (1.77-4.92) | <.001*** | 1.87 | (0.99-3.54) | 0.055* | 2.44 | (1.65-3.61) | <.001*** |
Missing | 0.31 | (0.04-2.26) | 0.246 | 1.74 | (0.48-6.30) | 0.400 | 0.81 | (0.29-2.26) | 0.694 |
Adjusted for gender, race, free or subsidized lunch status, cohort, randomized intervention assignment, average depressive symptoms in grades 1-3 and lifetime report of assaultive trauma and stratified by level of aggression.
Interaction model, adjusted for gender, race, free or subsidized lunch status, cohort, randomized intervention assignment, average depressive symptoms in grades 1-3 and lifetime report of assaultive trauma.
Relative odds estimate for effect of peer preference among highly aggressive children in Model 5 obtained using the lincom command in STATA: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.54-0.96, p-value = 0.025**).
p<0.10
p<0.05
p<0.001.