Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 20;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1247-8

Table 5.

Meaningful engagement by SUPERs

Training activities by SUPERs Impact/effect on SUPERs
Participated in capacity-building activities:
 - 4 sessions, 12 h face-to-face
 - Timeline activity to elicit past personal experiences of language barriers confirmed value and importance of experiential knowledge in PLA research
• Developed trust and rapport within combined community-university research team (FDB)
• Empowered SUPERs by enhancing knowledge about cross-cultural communication in academic literature (PE)
Engaged in intensive PLA training:
 - 6 sessions, 28 h face-to-face
 - additional piloting and practice hours
• Generated a skilled multiethnic, multilingual team capable of facilitating PLA research (FDB)
• Supported development of perceived confidence and competence to act as peer researchers (FDB) (PE)
Research activities by SUPERs Impact/effect on SUPERs
Facilitated sequence of PLA techniques in language-concordant manner
 - 1 session, 7 h face-to-face
 • Empowered SUPERs as active key ‘instruments’ in PLA research (FDB)
 • Confirmed value of language skills and cultural knowledge as means of addressing and ameliorating language and culture barriers in research (FDB)
 • Emphasised SUPERs’ ability to create inclusive research environment (FDB)
Applied range of mixed visual–verbal PLA techniques
Used co-designed protocol document
Culture-proofed PLA materials for use in various techniques
 • Empowered SUPERs as researchers – visual nature of techniques ameliorated migrants’ literacy challenges during research process (CH) (FDB)
 • Confirmed unique value of SUPERs’ active input into co-design of protocol and culture-proofing of PLA materials (FDB)
Identified and trained a ‘materials manager’ to assist with use of PLA materials, data displays, photography and group management  • Empowered SUPERs as decision-makers
(FDB)
Facilitated on-the-spot analysis with MSUs  • Confirmed SUPERs in their ability to engage in data co-analysis processes, which built confidence for subsequent team co-analysis (FDB)
Evaluated PLA research process
Debriefed PLA research process
 • Highlighted the positive relational environment SUPERs succeeded in generating during research process with migrants (FDB)
 • Enabled SUPERs to identify key strengths, learning, potential improvements (re PLA process, re own skills and competencies) (FDB)
• Allowed SUPERs to identify perceived benefits of engagement for themselves and their communities (FDB)
Co-analysed research results  • Confirmed SUPERs’ skills in eliciting migrant perspectives during PLA fieldwork; confirmed value of SUPERs’ continuing involvement and input into research (FDB) (CH) (PTAN)