Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 11;2:492–497. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.06.004

Table 1.

EIM acceptability phase: summary results among healthcare providers and health and fitness professionals.

Characteristic n (%)
Type of provider
 Physician 27 (90)
 Nurse practitioner 2 (7)
 Physician assistant 1 (3)
Proportion of practice chronic disease patients
 Less than 20% 7 (23)
 Greater than 20% 23 (77)
Proportion of practice older adult patients
 Less than 20% 12 (40)
 Greater than 20% 18 (60)
Use of provider action guide
 Difficult to use 3 (10)
 Neutral 15 (50)
 Easy to use 12 (40)
Use of physical activity assessment tools
 Difficult to use 2 (6.6)
 Neutral 14 (46.7)
 Easy to use 14 (46.7)
EIM helps counseling skills
 Neutral to not helpful 14 (46.7)
 Helpful to very helpful 16 (53.3)
EIM increases patient physical activity
 No 4 (13.3)
 Neutral 17 (56.7)
 Yes 9 (30)
Recommend EIM to other providers
 No 4 (13.3)
 Neutral 9 (30)
 Yes 17 (56.7)
Type of fitness professional
 Exercise physiologist 1 (6.7)
 Physical educator 2 (13.3)
 Parks and recreation specialist 2 (13.3)
 Personal trainer 10 (66.7)
EIM helps with provider communication
 Neutral to not helpful 7 (46.7)
 Helpful to very helpful 8 (53.3)
EIM helps with the referral to provider process
 Neutral to not helpful 0
 Helpful to very helpful 15 (100)
EIM enhanced communication with provider
 Yes 15 (100)
 No 0
Participants like EIM
 Yes 12 (80)
 No 3 (20)
Recommend EIM to other fitness professionals
 Neutral 2 (13.3)
 Yes 13 (86.7)
 No 0