. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Jan 18;38(5):497–515. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1125453

Table 5.

Results from linear regression analysis predicting OTDL and EPT in the ACTIVE dataset.

IADL measure	Predictor	b*	95% CI	t(2421)	p	VIF
OTDL	Subtest 1	−.02	[–0.06, 0.02]	−0.86	.389	1.24
	Subtest 2	−.20	[–0.25, –0.15]	−8.34	< .001	1.62
	Subtest 3	−.18	[–0.23, –0.13]	−7.01	< .001	1.79
	Subtest 4	−.07	[–0.11, –0.03]	−3.24	.001	1.37

EPT	Subtest 1	−.04	[–0.08, 0.00]	−2.09	.037	1.24
	Subtest 2	−.28	[–0.33, –0.24]	−12.08	< .001	1.62
	Subtest 3	−.14	[–0.19, –0.09]	−5.74	< .001	1.79
	Subtest 4	−.03	[–0.08, 0.01]	−1.55	.121	1.37

Note. UFOV subtests accounted for R² = .14, 90% CI [0.12, 0.16] of the variance in OTDL (F[4, 2421] = 100.33, p < .001) and for R² = .17, 90% CI [0.15, 0.19] of the variance in EPT (F[4, 2421] = 127.07, p < .001) scores. UFOV = Useful Field of View; OTDL = Observed Tasks of Daily Living; EPT = Everyday Problems Test.