Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan;62(1):e23–e30.

Table 5.

Significant predictors of scores ≥ 3.0 on primary care domains: There were no significant predictors for first-contact access.

DOMAIN RR 95% CI P VALUE
First-contact utilization
  • Age group: ≥ 65 y vs < 65 y 1.06 1.01–1.12 .01
  • Marital status: married or common law vs single 1.04 1.01–1.08 .02
  • Marital status: separated, divorced, or widowed vs single 1.06 1.01–1.10 .015
  • Employed vs not employed 1.04 1.01–1.07 .034
Continuous (ongoing) care
  • Age group: 40–64 y vs < 40 y and ≥ 65 y 1.18 1.07–1.31 .001
  • Health is excellent, very good, or good vs fair or poor 1.26 1.10–1.44 < .001
  • Lived in Canada ≤ 10 y vs > 10 y 0.65 0.51–0.84 < .001
  • Employed vs not employed 0.84 0.76–0.94 .001
Coordination of care
  • Age group: 40–64 y vs < 40 y and ≥ 65 y 1.18 1.04–1.32 .008
  • Age group: ≥ 65 y vs < 65 y 1.25 1.06–1.48 .01
  • More than high school education vs high school education or less 0.83 0.70–0.98 .03
Coordination of information systems
  • Age group: 40–64 y vs < 40 y and ≥ 65 y 1.48 1.15–1.91 .002
  • Age group: ≥ 65 y vs < 65 y 1.65 1.17–2.33 .004
  • Employed vs not employed 0.74 0.59–0.94 .01
Comprehensiveness of services available
  • Distributed site vs not a distributed site 0.60 0.39–0.94 .02
  • Mental health worker in FHT vs no mental health worker 2.14 1.25–3.67 .006
  • Income $36 000–$75 000 vs ≤ $35 000 and > $75 000 0.65 0.49–0.88 .005
  • Income > $75 000 vs ≤ $75 000 0.73 0.54–0.99 .04
Comprehensiveness of services provided
  • Income > $75 000 vs ≤ $75 000 0.71 0.52–0.98 .03

FHT—family health team, RR–relative risk.