Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 28;22(4):1684–1700. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i4.1684

Table 4.

Hepatitis C virus serofrequency in high risk population groups

S. # Year Place Method Sample size Seroprevalence (%) Ref.
Pregnant women
1 2009 Hazara ELISA1 500 8.6 [104]
2 2009 Swat ICT6 5607 2.6 [105]
3 2009 Karachi EIA2 5902 1.8 [106]
4 2010 Multan ICT6 500 7.0 [107]
5 2011 Karachi ELISA3 18000 5.79 [102]
6 2013 Hyderabad ELISA2 3078 4.7 [103]
Multi-transfused population (including pediatric population)
7 2009 Islamabad ELISA6 103 36.0 [108]
8 2010 Lahore Questionnaire 408 1.5 [110]
9 2011 KPK ICT4 40 15.0 [111]
10 2011 Karachi ELISA3 173 51.4 [86]
11 2012 Karachi ELISA5 160 13.0 [83]
12 2014 Rawalpindi ELISA6 95 49.5 [109]
Intravenous drug users
13 2011 KPK ICT4 42 14.28 [111]
14 2011 KPK ICT4 [113]
Peshawar 100 35.0
Kohat 60 25.0
Mardan 40 32.5
1

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics;

2

Abbott Diagnostics;

3

DiaSorin;

4

Acon Laboratories, CA, United States;

5

General Biologicals Corporation;

6

Manufacturer not mentioned in cited reference. KPK: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; ELISA: Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; EIA: Enzyme immunoassay; ICT: Immunochromatographic test.