Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;24(2):110–119. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0783-5

Table 3.

Multivariate analyses therapeutic decision (BMS vs DES)

Bivariate analyses (OR) Multivariate analyses (OR) p value*
Total population ( n = 442)
Number of diseased vessels
1 0.520 0.560 0.006
> 1 Ref
NYHA class
NYHA class I Ref
NYHA class II 1.478
NYHA class III + IV 5.311
Hospital
1 0.565
2 1.016
3 45.176
4 Ref
Diabetes (yes vs no) 8.680 8.318 p < 0.001
Renal artery disease (yes vs no) 0.368
Current smoker (yes vs no) 0.599
Previous MI (yes vs no) 1.486
PVD (yes vs no) 1.017
Previous PTCA (yes vs no) 2.045
TIMI score a
1 Ref
2 1.20
3 0.37
4 2.000
5 0.600
6 + 7 646189937
Constant 1.911 p < 0.001
Nagelkerke R2 16 %
Stable CAD (n  = 358) Bivariate analyses (OR) Multivariate analyses (OR) p value*
BMI (kg/m 2) 1.049
Hospital
1 0.578 0.466 0.013
2 1.034 1.047 0.884
3 26.671 29.381 0.001
4 Ref Ref
Previous MI (yes vs no) 1.513
NYHA class
NYHA class I Ref
NYHA class II 1.280
NYHA class III + IV 4.319
Number of diseased vessels
1 0.536
> 1 Ref
Current smoker (yes vs no) 0.588 0.404 0.014
Diabetes (yes vs no) 8.454 12.001 p < 0.001
Previous PTCA (yes vs no) 2.103 2.284 0.003
Constant 1.207 0.397
Nagelkerke R2 33 %
Unstable CAD (n= 84) Bivariate analyses (OR) Multivariate analyses (OR) p value*
Hospital
1 0.686
2 1.000
3 1346229036
4 Ref
NYHA class
NYHA class I Ref
NYHA class II 1105324892
NYHA class III + IV 8.895
Diabetes (yes vs no) 10.146 10.146 0.029
TIMI score a
1 Ref
2 1.600
3 0.369
4 1.900
5 0.600
6 + 7 646189937
SBP (mmHg) 1.007
Constant 1.577 0.069
Nagelkerke R 2 13 %

SBP systolic blood pressure, BMI body mass index, NYHA New York heart association, PTCA percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, TIMI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction.

aP value of multivariate analyses.

*p = 0.05