Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 22;7:26. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00026

Table 4.

Phonological and reading tasks.

Task Type of measure T1 mean (s.d.) T2 mean (s.d.) T3 mean (s.d.) T4 mean (s.d.) T1/T2 T2/T3 T3/T4
T-test P-value T-test P-value Effect size T-test P-value
Pseudo-word repetition Pseudo-word span 21.08 (8.83) 21.5 (6.20) 24.75 (6.16) 26.50 (6.15) 0.21 0.84 2.57 0.03* 0.52 1.48 0.17
Reading in 1 min (LUM) Nb items read (s.d. from norm) −2.24 (1.32) −2.12 (1.49) −1.66 (1.59) −1.64 (1.64) 1.34 0.20 5.59 0.001*** 0.29 0.20 0.85
Phoneme fusion (s.d. from norm) Phonemic fusion score −0.86 (0.96) −0.58 (0.86) 0.04 (0.73) −0.05 (0.80) 1.04 0.32 2.90 0.01** 0.78 0.70 0.50
Time phoneme fusion −0.31 (1.19) −0.29 (1.15) −0.02 (1.13) 0.06 (0.86) 0.32 0.75 1.94 0.07 0.46 0.65

Children' levels of performance were measured at T1 (6 weeks before CMT started) at T2 (just before CMT), at T3 (just after CMT), and at T4 (6 weeks after CMT ended). Mean and standard deviation or s.d. from norm (whenever indicated) are reported for each task. Student T-tests and p-values were computed and significant improvements are in bold (

***

p < 0.001;

**

p < 0.01;

*

p < 0.05). Effect sizes are also reported when relevant (Cohen's d).