Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;7(6):423–430. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.423

Table 2. Comparison of screw loosening, fracture and cumulative fracture rate (CFR) in gender, age, bone graft, length of implant, position, jawbone and type of diameter.

Screw loosening (n = 10) Fracture (n = 10)
No (%) P value* No (%) 5yr CFR 8yr CFR P value
Gender Male 7/251 (2.8) .360 8/251 (3.2) 2.50% 4.20% .159
Female 3/199 (1.5) 2/199 (1.0) 1.00% 1.00%
Age Young (15 - 39 years) 4/94 (4.3) .311 0/94 (0.0) 0.00% 0.00% .031
Middle (40 - 65 years) 5/278 (1.8) 10/278 (3.6) 3.10% 5.30%
Old (> 65 years) 1/78 (1.3) 0/78 (0.0) 0.00% 0.00%
Length 8 mm 2/82 (2.4) .864 3/82 (3.7) 3.70% 3.70% .538
9.5 mm 3/150 (2.0) 2/150 (1.3) 0.80% 3.70%
11 mm 5/195 (2.6) 4/195 (2.1) 1.60% 2.80%
14 mm 0/25 (0.0) 1/25 (4.0) 4.20% 4.20%
Type of diameter 3.5 mm 4/200 (2.0) .908 1/200 (0.5) 0.50% 0.50% .044
4.5 mm 5/218 (2.3) 7/218 (3.2) 2.30% 4.50%
5.5 mm 1/32 (3.2) 2/32 (6.5) 6.70% 6.70%
Position Anterior 2/100 (2.0) .330 1/100 (1.0) 1.10% 1.10% .027
Premolar 1/130 (0.8) 0/130 (0.0) 0.00% 0.00%
Molar 7/220 (3.2) 9/220 (4.1) 3.30% 5.80%
Mandible 3/197 (1.5) .524 5/197 (2.5) 2.10% 3.50% .716
Maxillary 7/253 (2.8) 5/253 (2.0) 1.70% 2.80%
Bone graft Yes 4/121 (1.8) .472 2/121 (1.6) 1.70% 1.70% .684
No 6/327 (3.3) 8/327 (2.4) 2.00% 3.30%

*a chi-square test or a Mann-Whitney rank sum test

Estimated Cumulative rate and P value from Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank test

In post-hoc analysis, only P value <.05 in 3.5 mm diameter vs 4.5 mm or 5.5 mm diameter, and there were no significant difference between 4.5 mm diameter and 5.5 mm diameter (P=.296)