Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 19;51(1):240–261. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12312

Table 5.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds Ratios for Old versus New CPS, 2013 CPS ASEC Content Test

Private Public Insured
Odds Ratio SE p Odds Ratio SE p Odds Ratio SE p
Overall sample
Model 1 1.152 0.0651 0.0120 0.884 0.0705 0.1230 1.147 0.0889 .0778
Model 2 1.132 0.0731 0.0549 0.916 0.0882 0.3639 1.158 0.0928 .0678
Model 3 1.128 0.0725 0.0604 0.923 0.0882 0.4021 1.171 0.0939 .0495
Retired sample
Model 1 1.17 0.0926 0.0536 0.90 0.0923 0.32 1.19 0.1280 .1009
Model 2 1.33 0.1387 0.0065 0.81 0.1000 0.09 1.34 0.1598 .0130
Model 3 1.31 0.1373 0.0091 0.81 0.0997 0.09 1.36 0.1603 .0103

Each parameter is from a separate regression. Private coverage includes ESI, directly purchased, and out‐of‐household coverage. Public includes Medicaid, CHIP, and other government‐assistance coverage. Model 1 reports the unadjusted odds ratios. Model 2 controls for age, race/ethnicity, sex, household tenure (owned/rented), and the marital, education, and work status of the head of household. Model 3 controls for Model 2 covariates and relationship with household respondent (self, child, other) and household size. Complete model results are produced in the appendix. OR (odds ratio) is the odds of coverage from the new instrument relative to the odds of coverage from the old instrument. Main unweighted sample n = 29,629 (Test n = 16,401; Control n = 13,228); Retired unweighted control sample n = 10,296; test n = 5,818. All estimates are weighted. Bold text indicates statistical significance at the 0.05 level.

Source: 2013 CPS ASEC Content Test.