Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 25;40(1):129–137. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.135

Table 3. Comparison of ECS and glucose uptake-related mRNA in mouse epididymal fat pad after 62 and 118 days of feeding AIN 93M semipurified diets.

Measurements Day 62
Day 118
Mean testing P-value
  Control DHA Control DHA Day 62 Day 118 62 vs118 days control 62 vs 118 days DHA
CB1 1.0±0.1 0.4±0.03 1.0±0.1 0.2±0.01 0.9
CB2 1.0±0.1 1.8±0.2 1.0±0.1 1.9±0.2 0.9 0.5
NAPE-PLD 1.0±0.1 2.1±0.2 1.0±0.1 2.4±0.2 1
FAAH 1.0±0.1 1.0±0.1 1.0±0.1 1.2±0.1 0.8  
DAGL-α 1.0±0.1 0.6±0.03 1.0±0.1 0.3±0.02 0.9
DAGL-β 1.0±0.05 0.7±0.1 1.0±0.04 0.4±0.02 1
Akt-1 1.0±0.1 0.7±0.04 1.0±0.1 0.4±0.01 1
Insulin R 1.0±0.1 0.5±0.03 1.0±0.1 0.5±0.04 1
IRS-1 1.0±0.1 1.5±0.1 1.0±0.1 1.8±0.1 0.9
GLUT4 1.0±0.1 0.6±0.04 1.0±0.1 0.3±0.02 1
GLUT1 1.0±0.1 1.6±0.1 1.0±0.1 2.2±0.1 1
Adiponectin 1.0±0.1 1.9±0.1 1.0±0.04 2.8±0.2 0.9
IL-6 1.0±0.1 0.7±0.04 1.0±0.1 0.5±0.02 1
TNF-α 1.0±0.05 0.5±0.04 1.0±0.1 0.5±0.03 1
MCP1 1.0±0.1 0.7±0.05 1.0±0.1 0.6±0.03 1
AMPK α2 1.0±0.1 1.6±0.1 1.0±0.1 1.6±0.1 1 0.4
Adenylate Cyclase 1.0±0.1 1.1±0.04 1.0±0.04 2.1±0.1 1
p42/p44 (MAPK) 1.0±0.1 0.8±0.1 1.0±0.1 0.6±0.1 1
p38 (MAPK) 1.0±0.1 0.5±0.03 1.0±0.1 0.5±0.03 0.9 0.3
JNK (MAPK) 1.0±0.1 0.6±0.1 1.0±0.1 0.4±0.03 1

Abbreviations: Akt1, RAC-α serine/threonine-protein kinase (protein kinase B); CB1, cannabinoid receptor 1; CB2, cannabinoid receptor 2; DAGLα, diacylglycerol lipase-α DAGLβ, diacylglycerol lipase-β DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EAC, endocannabinoid system; FAAH, fatty acid amide hydrolase; GLUT4, glucose transporter type 4; IL-6, interleukin-6; INS-R, insulin receptor; JNK, Jun N-terminal kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MyoD1, myogenic differentiation; NAPE-PLD, N-acyl phosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase D; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Values are the mean±s.d. (n=9) of ΔΔCT calculated from mouse tissue mRNA. Differences between diet groups and between time within the same diet groups were compared by t-test.

Mean values of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) data were compared by t-test using SAS software.

Significant differences in means: *P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001.